网站导航     在线客服  
小站教育
学生选择在小站备考:30天 525565名,今日申请3148人    备考咨询 >>

新GRE作文真题满分范文讲解剖析之海鲜餐厅

2015年05月07日17:07 来源:小站整理
参与(0) 阅读(1734)

GRE备考资料免费领取

免费领取
摘要:GRE作文题库公开透明,但庞大的作文题量,对于考生仍然是巨大的挑战。小站为大家整理了针对题库中ARGUMENT类文章题目的满分范文,包含详细的逐段讲解和满分要素剖析,相信能给大家提供一些帮助。

GRE作文考试最大的特点,便是GRE题库的公开,所有GRE考试中可能会出现的作文题目,都已经事先公布在ETS的GRE官网上。尽管考题公开透明,但庞大的题量,对于想要做好充分准备的考生来说,仍然算得上是巨大的挑战。为了方便广大考生准备GRE作文,小站为大家整理了针对题库中ARGUMENT类文章题目的满分范文,包含详细的逐段讲解和满分要素剖析,相信能给大家提供一些帮助。

新GRE作文真题满分范文讲解剖析之海鲜餐厅图1

Arg-39

A recent sales study indicated that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent over the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants that specialize in seafood. Moreover, the majority of families in Bay City are two-income families, and a nationwide study has shown that such families eat significantly fewer home-cooked meals than they did a decade ago but at the same time express more concern about eating healthily. Therefore, a new Bay City restaurant specializing in seafood will be quite popular and profitable.

【满分范文赏析】

This argument's conclusion is that a new Bay City restaurant specializing in seafood would be both popular and profitable. To justify this conclusion the argument indicates that seafood consumption in Bay City's restaurants has risen by 30% during the last five years. The argument also indicates that most Bay City families are two-income families. Citing a national survey, the argument indicates that two-income families eat out more often, express more concern about eating healthily than they did ten years ago and would therefore lead to a new Bay City restaurant becoming popular and profitable. That argument fails to be persuasive as the assumptions upon which it is based do not link with the author’s conclusion.

【本段结构】

本文采用了标准的Argument开头段结构,即C—A—F的开头结构。本段首先概括原文的Conclusion,之后简要提及原文为支持其结论所引用的一系列Assumption及细节,最后给出开头段到正文段的过渡句,指出原文的Flaw,即这些Assumption无法让原文的结论具有说服力。

【本段功能】

作为Argument开头段,本段具体功能就在于发起攻击并概括原文的结论,即在Bay城市专营海鲜的餐厅将会受到人们的欢迎并有利可图。本段接下来提到了原文中为支持之前的Conclusion所提供的证据,包括Bay城市的海鲜食物消费量上升了,在Bay城市最多的家庭类型是双收入家庭,而根据一项国家调查,这样的双收入家庭比以前更关心他们的饮食质量。文章提及这些信息,为是在正文段中对这些Assumption即将进行的具体攻击做铺垫。

Firstly, a 30% increase in the sales of seafood at Bay City restaurants does not adequately represent the demand necessary to justify the opening of a new restaurant. While a 30% is certainly significant, the actual volume might be too low to generate revenue. Lacking evidence that a significant number of the city's restaurant patrons are ordering seafood, the argument's conclusion that a new seafood restaurant would be popular and profitable is unfounded.

【本段结构】

本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构,即先是提及原文的第一个逻辑错误,之后分析该逻辑错误的原因,接下来,进一步分析这样的错误为什么让原文的Conclusion不成立。

新GRE作文真题满分范文讲解剖析之海鲜餐厅图2


【本段结构】

本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构,即先是提及原文的第二个逻辑错误,之后分析该逻辑错误的原因,接下来,进一步分析这样的错误为什么让原文的Conclusion不成立。

【本段功能】

作为正文第二段,本段攻击原文所犯的第二个重要逻辑错误——因果类错误。原文假设因为人们爱吃海鲜食物,他们一定喜欢去海鲜专营餐厅进餐。但事实上这样的因果关系并不成立,因为可能存在其他的因素导致当地的人们不会选择海鲜专营餐厅。因此在没有考虑到这些额外因素的情况下,原文的这个假设也是不合理的。

Thirdly, the nationwide study indicating that two-income families exhibit the tendency towards dining out and eating healthily does not indicate that this trend will extend to a Bay City restaurant. This is to say that perhaps the two-income families polled may equate Bay City with dining out but not necessarily eating healthy. In this case, Bay City could not depend on their patronage.

【本段结构】

本段采用了标准的Argument正文段结构,即先是提及原文的第四个逻辑错误,之后分析该逻辑错误的原因,接下来,进一步分析这样的错误为什么让原文的Conclusion不成立。

【本段功能】

作为正文第五段,本段攻击原文所犯的第五个重要逻辑错误——因果类错误。原文假设如果当地人们的确喜欢这个海鲜专营餐厅,那么它一定能够盈利。但是,由于在商业竞争当中,盈利问题要涉及到很多因素,比如成本和收入,这样的因果关系并不一定能成立。所以,在没有考虑这些因素的情况下,原文的结论并不成立。

As it stands, the argument is unpersuasive. To bolster it the author must demonstrate that the demand among restaurant patrons for seafood is sufficient to justify the opening of a new seafood restaurant. The argument must also demonstrate that the restaurants would be a consideration of Bay City families. The author could also strengthen the argument by providing reliable evidence that Bay City reflects the nationwide trends cited, and that these trends will continue in the foreseeable future in Bay City.


特别申明:本文内容来源网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵权请立即与我们联系contactus@zhan.com,我们将及时处理。

相关文章

如何在30分钟内写完GRE作文?3步走带你轻松解决 【备考每日练】最新GRE ISSUE作文题之社会与模范人物... 【备考每日练】最新GRE ARGUMENT作文题之篮子考古 【备考每日练】最新GRE ISSUE作文题之成功与新领导阶... 【备考每日练】最新GRE ISSUE作文题之政府与艺术的关... 【备考每日练】最新GRE ARGUMENT作文题之房地产公... GRE写作必备句型汇总 没有最全只有更全 GRE作文issue部分写作误区详解 规避错误拿高分
未输入验证码
未输入验证码
未输入验证码
获取验证码
免费领取
日排行
周排行
GRE关键词
版权申明| 隐私保护| 意见反馈| 联系我们| 关于我们| 网站地图| 最新资讯
© 2011-2019 ZHAN.com All Rights Reserved. 沪ICP备13042692号-23
沪公网安备 31011002003961号