2020年10月16日/18日GRE逻辑预测汇总归纳 点亮你的逻辑思维技能
- 2020年10月12日11:41 来源：小站教育作者：小站GRE编辑
- 参与（0） 阅读（2309）
2020年10月16日/18日场次GRE逻辑阅读预测发布，本篇预测包含对10月16日/18日GRE阅读中逻辑阅读题目的内容盘点以及逻辑链分析，帮助大家理顺思路做好逻辑烧脑难题，一起来看！
2020年10月16日/18日GRE预测其他题型预测：作文/短阅读/长阅读/填空/等价/数学 请走这里
逻辑阅读
Despite the fact that the health-inspection procedures for catering establishments are more stringent than those for ordinary restaurants, more of the cases of food poisoning reported to the city health department were brought on by banquets served by catering services than were brought on by restaurant meals.
Which of the following, if true, helps explain the apparent paradox in the statement above?
A. A significantly larger number of people eat in restaurants than attend catered banquets in any given time period.
B. Catering establishments know how many people they expect to serve, and therefore are less likely than restaurants to have, and serve, leftover food, a major source of food poisoning.
C. Many restaurants provide catering services for banquets in addition to serving individual meals.
D. The number of reported food-poisoning cases at catered banquets is unrelated to whether the meal is served on the caterer’s or the client’s premises.
E. People are unlikely to make a connection between a meal they have eaten and a subsequent illness unless the illness strikes a group who are in communication with one another.
正确答案：E
题目解析：
逻辑：食物中毒-->宴席被报告
假设：食物中毒一定会被报告(无论是在餐厅还是在宴席上)
原文漏洞：尽管宴席上的食物比普通餐厅的食物经过了更严格的检查，但宴席上被报告出食物中毒的案例却多于餐厅的。
解题思路：假设取反(一切可以推翻假设的方式都可以)
E选项：给出了人们在普通餐厅吃饭中毒却不一定报告的情况，而在宴席上因为有认识的同伴一起进食从而可以确定是在宴席上中毒了。这是食物中毒一定会被举报的一种反例。
除了逻辑阅读预测，还有短阅读预测精彩内容 点击查看
