2015年GRE第1场考试ISSUE范文解析

2015年01月22日10:55 来源：小站整理

参与（3） 阅读（14887）

2015年1月18日，GRE终于迎来了今年的首场考试。在此，我们与各位同学分享新年首考Issue范文，希望对各位备战今年的GRE有帮助。

Claim: In any field-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down after five years.

结论： 在商业、政治、教育、政府等任何领域，掌权者应在5年后让位。

Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is a revitalization through new leadership.

理由：对于任何机构而言，走向成功的最可靠的途径就是通过新领导层实现革新。

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim the reason on which that claim is based.

以上GREISSUE题目属于”机构领域类”范畴，要求考生就”掌权者应该在5年后让位”这个说法展开论述，该说法所供理由是”新领导者可以通过革新促进机构成功“。

写作思路：

1.仔细审题，寻找切入点：任期，让位，革新。

2.构建逻辑框架。

首先，明确自己的观点：部分同意。可从两方面进行论证，一方面，在大多数情况下，掌权者理应在有限的任期期满后让位给更有能力的继任者。另一方面，在有些情况下，领导者有权获得更长的任期。最后，总结自己的论述。

范文：

Leadership alternation appears to be a routine in diverse organizations. Indeed, when fresh troops of senior executives or officials succeed their predecessors, dynamic and innovative strategies may be put forward and faster progress is liable to ensue. Conversely, suppose an ineffective leading team always remains unaltered, the success of an enterprise may be at stake. Given this, I genuinely approve of the necessity for leaders whose terms have expired to hand over their power to those who are more capable of making a difference. Nonetheless, as for prominent leaders, they are entitled to serve for a longer period of time.

On the one hand, newly-appointed leaders are emboldened to bring forth positive and thorough changes so as to justify their superiority over their precursors. Anyhow, “a new broom sweeps clean.” Normally, soon after they assume office, radical reforms that facilitate better operation may be sketched out and then strictly enforced. Regarding institutions that aim to snatch and fortify a dominant status within their respective fields, timely reformation is much desired.In other words, the mission of a new leadership is of supernal worth to the promising future of an organization. This is basically determined by the heightened demand for strategic revitalization as well as miscellaneous exterior impacts. For example, in many countries around the world, top government leaders, including the president, the prime minister, the foreign minister and other high-ranking officials, are jointly elected to serve for one or at two terms. Each term of service largely extends over 4 or 5 years.Meanwhile, relevant laws and regulations empower smooth leadershipsubstitutions at the national level. As a consequence, all leaders should fully appreciate the essentiality of a finite term. By making the wisest use of this precious length of time, they shall be able to make their marks on the history of their organizations.

Mr. Xi Jinping, a widely-acclaimed politician, was elected President of China in 2013. Ever since the accession of a new leadership, the Chinese people have profoundly sensed desirable changes taking place in different aspects of life. In his inaugural speech, President Xi vowed to crack down on corruption and curb waste. So far, the comprehensive Anti-corruption Campaign has been sternly implemented and frugality advocated nationwide. Being a man of his words, President Xi initiated daring cases against many former top officials once involved in corruption-related scandals.To intensify such efforts, he even delegated “centrally-dispatched inspection teams” to conduct in-depth investigations on public officials. When it comes to economic reforms, a new policy was intended to reduce the government’sparticipation in capital distribution and restructure state-owned enterprises. Undoubtedly, the entire nation is thankful for this laudable leadership subrogation and embraces firm confidence to realize the magnificent “Chinese Dream”.

On the other hand, there are also instances that substantiate prolonged terms of office. Witnessing the emergence of predominant leaders, particularly entrepreneurs, we should by no means underrate the irreplaceable role they play in administrating their own ventures. Though starting from scratch, they have gradually constructed unrivaled leading forces that may function well for a much longer period. It was Konosuke Matsushita who founded Panasonic in 1917. Without any capital or manufacturing experience at the very beginning, he resolved to carry forward his business endeavor. Having gone throughmany years of assiduous struggle, he finally boosted his company to be one of the world’s largest manufacturers of electrical products, which certifies Matsushita’s remarkablecapability as a business leader. He remained active and powerful in Panasonic's operation right until his complete retirement in 1973.Clearly, he deserves more time in power.

To sum up, the effectiveness of an organization can be restored or upgraded through leadership switches on suitable occasions. That is to say, most leaders are supposed to work for a restricted length of time. In the process, if their leadership techniques exhibit certain drawbacks, a reliable way is to revitalize the situation by selectingbrand-newleaders. After all, only those who manage to attain the highest efficiency are likely to hold their power as long as possible.