名师心血之作，考生必备最完美写作等价资料，让GRE作文更加完美，打造你的完美GRE分数，走过路过不要错过，命运掌握在自己手中，GRE掌握在自己手中，每日练一练，分数节节高，你值得拥有，且看且珍惜!GRE必胜!
每日一练
Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented anew procedure that encouraged students toevaluate the teaching effectiveness of all theirprofessors. Since that time, Omega professors havebegun to assign higher grades in their classes, andoverall student grade averages at Omega have risenby 30 percent. Potential employers, looking at thisdramatic rise in grades, believe that grades at Omega are inflated and do not accuratelyreflect student achievement; as a result, Omega graduates have not been as successful atgetting jobs as have graduates from nearby Alpha University. To enable its graduates tosecure better jobs, Omega University should terminate student evaluation of professors.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate theargument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
题目翻译
15年前，Omega大学实施了一项新措施，鼓励学生对所有教授的教学效果进行评价。从那以后，Omega的教授开始给予学生更高的分数，Omega的学生成绩总平均上升了30%。未来的雇主显然认为Omega的分数贬值了;这可以解释为什么Omega的毕业生找工作时没有邻近的Alpha大学毕业生成。为使Omega毕业生找到好工作，我们应立即停止学生对教授的评价。
题目分析
1.没有信息说明30%的份数增长是评估教授效率的结果
2.没有信息说明是成绩缩水导致毕业生找不到好工作
3.其他因素：没有考虑是否有其他因素帮助提高Omega学生的就业率;没有说明让学生评价教授是否有好的一面
2015年最新GRE ARGUMENT作文每日一练(11月23日) http://gre.zhan.com/tifen/38109.html
2015年最新GRE ARGUMENT作文每日一练(11月20日) http://gre.zhan.com/tifen/38030.html
